Emerson WorldWide Magnetic Therapy products Logo

 Home         Contact Us
    Ankle Pain
    Back Pain
     Elbow Pain
     Foot Pain
     Hand Pain
     Heel Pain
     Knee Pain
     Neck Pain
     Shoulder Pain
     Thumb Pain
     Wrist/Palm Pain
     Spot Magnets
     Magnet Mattress
     Magnet Pad Kit
     Pulsed Magnetics
     Magnet FAQs


 
    Acupuncture
    ICE Therapy 
   Infrared Therapy
    Laser Systems
   
Light Therapy     Saunas
    Skin Care
   
Vibrational           Therapy


Insurance Claim Info

 Equine Pain  Cat/Dog Pain

 Emerson  Art: 
    Watercolors
     Pet Portraits
     Bridal Bouquets
   Home Portraits

    Links
   Site Map

   Secure Shopping Site
   Fast Shipping

   Shipment Tracking
   Email Confirmations
Satisfaction Guaranteed


Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of static magnets for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a pilot study.
Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Simon LS, Davis RB, Walleczek J, Mayo-Smith M, Kaptchuk TJ, Phillips RS.
Division for Research and Education, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

CONTEXT: Outpatient clinical studies of magnet therapy, a complementary therapy commonly used to treat osteoarthritis (OA), have been limited by the absence of a credible placebo control.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the feasibility and promise of studying static magnetic therapy for knee OA and determine the ability of a new placebo-magnet device to provide concealment of group assignment.

DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTING: Academic teaching hospital in Boston. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 29 subjects with idiopathic or post-traumatic OA of the knee.

INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either high-strength magnetic (active) or placebo-magnetic (placebo) knee sleeve treatment for 4 hours in a monitored setting and self-treatment 6 hours daily for 6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were change in knee pain as measured by the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale at 6 weeks and extent of group concealment at study end.

RESULTS: At 4 hours, VAS pain scores (+/- SE) on a 5-item scale (0-500, 500 worst) decreased 79 +/- 18 mm in the active group and 10 +/- 21 mm in the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in any primary or secondary measure of efficacy between the treatment groups at 6 weeks. Despite widespread testing for magnetic properties, at study end, 69% of the active group and 77% of the placebo group (P > 0.2) believed that they had been assigned to the active treatment group.

CONCLUSION: Despite our small sample size, magnets showed statistically significant efficacy compared to placebo after 4 hours under rigorously controlled conditions. The sustained efficacy of magnetic therapy for knee osteoarthritis could be assessed in an adequately powered trial utilizing an appropriate control such our new placebo-magnet device.

Publication Types:


Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15055092 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]